↓ Skip to main content

Altered immunoglobulin expression and functional silencing of self-reactive B lymphocytes in transgenic mice

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, August 1988
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
27 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
1393 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
350 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Altered immunoglobulin expression and functional silencing of self-reactive B lymphocytes in transgenic mice
Published in
Nature, August 1988
DOI 10.1038/334676a0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher C. Goodnow, Jeffrey Crosbie, Stephen Adelstein, Thomas B. Lavoie, Sandra J. Smith-Gill, Robert A. Brink, Helen Pritchard-Briscoe, John S. Wotherspoon, Robert H. Loblay, Kathy Raphael, Ronald J. Trent, Antony Basten

Abstract

Immunological tolerance has been demonstrated in double-transgenic mice expressing the genes for a neo-self antigen, hen egg lysozyme, and a high affinity anti-lysozyme antibody. The majority of anti-lysozyme B-cells did not undergo clonal deletion, but were no longer able to secrete anti-lysozyme antibody and displayed markedly reduced levels of surface IgM while continuing to express high levels of surface IgD. These findings indicate that self tolerance may result from mechanisms other than clonal deletion, and are consistent with the hypothesis that IgD may have a unique role in B-cell tolerance.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 337 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 26%
Researcher 57 16%
Student > Master 33 9%
Student > Bachelor 33 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 6%
Other 64 18%
Unknown 50 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 101 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 77 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 47 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 13%
Neuroscience 4 1%
Other 22 6%
Unknown 54 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,951,081
of 23,367,368 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#40,899
of 92,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280
of 13,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#13
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,367,368 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 100.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.