↓ Skip to main content

The Mussel Watch concept

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, July 1986
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
216 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
The Mussel Watch concept
Published in
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, July 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf00398031
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward D. Goldberg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 105 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 17%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 26 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 26%
Environmental Science 27 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Chemistry 4 4%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 31 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#555
of 2,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,057
of 10,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,748 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them