↓ Skip to main content

Estimated effects of adding universal public coverage of an essential medicines list to existing public drug plans in Canada

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
28 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
113 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimated effects of adding universal public coverage of an essential medicines list to existing public drug plans in Canada
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, February 2017
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.161082
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven G. Morgan, Winny Li, Brandon Yau, Nav Persaud

Abstract

Canada's universal health care system does not include universal coverage of prescription drugs. We sought to estimate the effects of adding universal public coverage of an essential medicines list to existing public drug plans in Canada. We used administrative and market research data to estimate the 2015 shares of the volume and cost of prescriptions filled in the community setting that were for 117 drugs on a model list of essential medicines for Canada. We compared prices of these essential medicines in Canada with prices in the United States, Sweden and New Zealand. We estimated the cost of adding universal public drug coverage of these essential medicines based on anticipated effects on medication use and pricing. The 117 essential medicines on the model list accounted for 44% of all prescriptions and 30% of total prescription drug expenditures in 2015. Average prices of generic essential medicines were 47% lower in the US, 60% lower in Sweden and 84% lower in New Zealand; brand-name drugs were priced 43% lower in the US. Estimated savings from universal public coverage of these essential medicines was $4.27 billion per year (range $2.72 billion to $5.83 billion; 28% reduction) for patients and private drug plan sponsors, at an incremental government cost of $1.23 billion per year (range $373 million to $1.98 billion; 11% reduction). Our analysis showed that adding universal public coverage of essential medicines to the existing public drug plans in Canada could address most of Canadians' pharmaceutical needs and save billions of dollars annually. Doing so may be a pragmatic step forward while more comprehensive pharmacare reforms are planned.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 113 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 139 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 25%
Student > Bachelor 29 21%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 29 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 18%
Social Sciences 16 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 33 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 312. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2022.
All research outputs
#110,801
of 25,651,057 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#206
of 9,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,623
of 326,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#7
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,651,057 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.