↓ Skip to main content

Dietary Flavonoid Intake and Esophageal Cancer Risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition Cohort

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Epidemiology, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary Flavonoid Intake and Esophageal Cancer Risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition Cohort
Published in
American Journal of Epidemiology, May 2013
DOI 10.1093/aje/kwt026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esther Vermeulen, Raul Zamora-Ros, Eric J Duell, Leila Luján-Barroso, Heiner Boeing, Krasimira Aleksandrova, H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Augustin Scalbert, Isabelle Romieu, Veronika Fedirko, Marina Touillaud, Guy Fagherazzi, Florence Perquier, Esther Molina-Montes, Maria-Dolores Chirlaque, Marcial Vicente Argüelles, Pilar Amiano, Aurelio Barricarte, Valeria Pala, Amalia Mattiello, Calogero Saieva, Rosario Tumino, Fulvio Ricceri, Antonia Trichopoulou, Effie Vasilopoulou, Gianna Ziara, Francesca L Crowe, Kay-Thee Khaw, Nicholas J Wareham, Annekatrin Lukanova, Verena A Grote, Anne Tjønneland, Jytte Halkjær, Lea Bredsdorff, Kim Overvad, Peter D Siersema, Petra H M Peeters, Anne M May, Elisabete Weiderpass, Guri Skeie, Anette Hjartåker, Rikard Landberg, Ingegerd Johansson, Emily Sonestedt, Ulrika Ericson, Elio Riboli, Carlos A González

Abstract

We prospectively investigated dietary flavonoid intake and esophageal cancer risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort. The study included 477,312 adult subjects from 10 European countries. At baseline, country-specific validated dietary questionnaires were used. During a mean follow-up of 11 years (1992-2010), there were 341 incident esophageal cancer cases, of which 142 were esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), 176 were esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and 23 were other types of esophageal cancer. In crude models, a doubling in total dietary flavonoid intake was inversely associated with esophageal cancer risk (hazard ratio (HR) (log₂) = 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78, 0.98) but not in multivariable models (HR (log₂) = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.86, 1.10). After covariate adjustment, no statistically significant association was found between any flavonoid subclass and esophageal cancer, EAC, or ESCC. However, among current smokers, flavonols were statistically significantly associated with a reduced esophageal cancer risk (HR (log₂) = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.94), whereas total flavonoids, flavanols, and flavan-3-ol monomers tended to be inversely associated with esophageal cancer risk. No associations were found in either never or former smokers. These findings suggest that dietary flavonoid intake was not associated with overall esophageal cancer, EAC, or ESCC risk, although total flavonoids and some flavonoid subclasses, particularly flavonols, may reduce the esophageal cancer risk among current smokers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 65 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 25%
Student > Master 15 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Professor 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Chemistry 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2013.
All research outputs
#18,343,746
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Epidemiology
#8,487
of 8,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,134
of 193,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Epidemiology
#88
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.