↓ Skip to main content

Effect of low-level laser therapy in patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis: a single-blinded randomized clinical study

Overview of attention for article published in Lasers in Medical Science, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
Title
Effect of low-level laser therapy in patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis: a single-blinded randomized clinical study
Published in
Lasers in Medical Science, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10103-013-1393-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmad Alghadir, Mohammed Taher Ahmed Omar, Abeer Bashier Al-Askar, Naser Khwietm Al-Muteri

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on pain relief and functional performance in patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis (OA). Forty patients with knee OA were randomly assigned into active laser group (n = 20) and placebo laser group (n = 20). The LLLT device used was a Ga-As diode laser with a power output of 50 mW, a wavelength of 850 nm, and a diameter beam of 1 mm. Eight points were irradiated and received dosage of 6 J/point for 60 s, with a total dosage of 48 J/cm(2) in each session. The placebo group was identical but treated without emission of energy. LLLT was applied two times per week over the period of 4 weeks. Outcome measurements included pain intensity at rest and at movement on visual analog scale, knee function using Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scale, and ambulation duration. These measurements were collected at baseline and post-intervention. The results showed significant improvements in all assessment parameters in both groups compared to baseline. Active laser group showed significant differences in pain intensity at rest and movement, knee function, and ambulation duration when compared with the placebo group. Therefore, LLLT seemed to be an effective modality for short-term pain relief and function improvement in patients with chronic knee OA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 152 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 15%
Student > Master 18 12%
Unspecified 9 6%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Researcher 8 5%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 58 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 11%
Unspecified 9 6%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Sports and Recreations 4 3%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 59 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2017.
All research outputs
#6,765,156
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from Lasers in Medical Science
#223
of 1,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,346
of 198,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lasers in Medical Science
#6
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,303 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.