↓ Skip to main content

Randomized controlled trial of topical EMLA and breastfeeding for reducing pain during wDPT vaccination

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Randomized controlled trial of topical EMLA and breastfeeding for reducing pain during wDPT vaccination
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00431-013-2076-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Navratan Kumar Gupta, Amit Upadhyay, Astha Agarwal, Gaurav Goswami, Jagdish Kumar, V. Sreenivas

Abstract

The primary objective was to evaluate the analgesic effect of a eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) during whole cell DPT vaccination. The secondary objective was to evaluate if the analgesic effect of EMLA was synergistic to breastfeeding. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial was done to include infants of up to 3 months of age who came for their first DPT vaccination. The outcome variables were duration of cry, latency of onset of cry, and Modified Facial Coding Score. Thirty babies were enrolled in each of three groups. The groups did not differ significantly in baseline characteristics. Median (interquartile range) of duration of cry was least [34.6 (24.1-72.2) s] in babies receiving EMLA cream with breastfeeding (EB group), followed by 94.2 (46.1-180) s in babies receiving EMLA cream with oral distilled water (EW group), as compared to 180.0 (180-180) s in babies receiving placebo cream with oral distilled water (PCW group) (p < 0.05). Mean (SD) of latency of cry was significantly greater in EB group [2.4 (1.14) s] and EW group [1.9 (0.62) s] as compared to babies in PCW group [1.5 (0.47) s] (p < 0.05), but the difference between EB and EW groups was not significant. Modified Facial Coding Score was significantly lower in EB group as compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Topical EMLA is effective in reducing pain and has a synergistic effect in analgesia when combined with breastfeeding during vaccination in infants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
India 1 1%
Unknown 78 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 14%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 26 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 24%
Psychology 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 28 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2022.
All research outputs
#6,418,321
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1,240
of 3,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,355
of 195,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#10
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.