| Title |
Evolution of haemodynamics and outcome of fluid-refractory septic shock in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-013-3003-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Akash Deep, Chulananda D. A. Goonasekera, Yanzhong Wang, Joe Brierley |
| Abstract |
Maintaining threshold values of cardiac output (CO) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) when used as part of the American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) haemodynamic protocol improves the outcomes in paediatric septic shock. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 15% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 22% |
| Unknown | 25 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 65% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2018.
All research outputs
#14,757,547
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#3,921
of 4,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,555
of 195,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#27
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.