| Title |
The Impact of Medical Interpretation Method on Time and Errors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-007-0361-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francesca Gany, Luciano Kapelusznik, Kavitha Prakash, Javier Gonzalez, Lurmag Y. Orta, Chi-Hong Tseng, Jyotsna Changrani |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 23% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 10% |
| Linguistics | 9 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2018.
All research outputs
#8,282,701
of 25,425,223 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,339
of 8,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,185
of 89,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#32
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,425,223 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.