↓ Skip to main content

DNA persistence after treatment of Lyme borreliosis

Overview of attention for article published in Folia Microbiologica, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 797)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
DNA persistence after treatment of Lyme borreliosis
Published in
Folia Microbiologica, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12223-013-0272-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. Pícha, L. Moravcová, D. Vaňousová, J. Hercogová, Z. Blechová

Abstract

One hundred twenty-four patients-53 with neuroborreliosis, 48 with erythema migrans, and 23 with Lyme arthritis-were tested in a prospective study for the presence of the DNA of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), urine, and synovial fluid by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Specific DNA was detected using five amplification systems simultaneously: three targeted chromosomal genes encoding 16S rDNA, flagellin, and p66; and two plasmid sequences of OspA and OspC. Patients were examined clinically and by PCR before and after treatment and again after 3 and 6 months. Before treatment, the specific DNA was detected in 78 patients (62.9 %). Forty-one neuroborreliosis patients were DNA-positive (77.4 %), with CSF positivity in 26 patients, urine in 25, and plasma in 16. Twenty-six erythema migrans patients were DNA-positive (54.2 %), with plasma positivity in 18 cases and urine in 14. Eleven Lyme arthritis cases (47.8 %) were DNA positive (six in urine, five in plasma, and four in synovial fluid). The frequency of PCR positives was comparable in CSF and urine, and it was lower by approximately 50 % in plasma. Specific DNA was also found in a significant number of patients in later testing periods: 48 patients after treatment, 29 patients after 3 months, and 6 patients after 6 months. The prolonged PCR positivity was not explainable by persistent infection according to the clinical manifestations of the disease. Possible explanations of the problem are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 2 5%
Netherlands 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 40 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Unspecified 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 12 27%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 18%
Unspecified 5 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,688,099
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Folia Microbiologica
#19
of 797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,346
of 209,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Microbiologica
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 797 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them