↓ Skip to main content

De novo mutations in epileptic encephalopathies

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1318 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
959 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
De novo mutations in epileptic encephalopathies
Published in
Nature, August 2013
DOI 10.1038/nature12439
Pubmed ID
Abstract

Epileptic encephalopathies are a devastating group of severe childhood epilepsy disorders for which the cause is often unknown. Here we report a screen for de novo mutations in patients with two classical epileptic encephalopathies: infantile spasms (n = 149) and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (n = 115). We sequenced the exomes of 264 probands, and their parents, and confirmed 329 de novo mutations. A likelihood analysis showed a significant excess of de novo mutations in the ∼4,000 genes that are the most intolerant to functional genetic variation in the human population (P = 2.9 × 10(-3)). Among these are GABRB3, with de novo mutations in four patients, and ALG13, with the same de novo mutation in two patients; both genes show clear statistical evidence of association with epileptic encephalopathy. Given the relevant site-specific mutation rates, the probabilities of these outcomes occurring by chance are P = 4.1 × 10(-10) and P = 7.8 × 10(-12), respectively. Other genes with de novo mutations in this cohort include CACNA1A, CHD2, FLNA, GABRA1, GRIN1, GRIN2B, HNRNPU, IQSEC2, MTOR and NEDD4L. Finally, we show that the de novo mutations observed are enriched in specific gene sets including genes regulated by the fragile X protein (P < 10(-8)), as has been reported previously for autism spectrum disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 959 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 8 <1%
Unknown 928 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 202 21%
Researcher 167 17%
Student > Bachelor 82 9%
Student > Master 81 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 61 6%
Other 194 20%
Unknown 172 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 200 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 178 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 158 16%
Neuroscience 117 12%
Psychology 19 2%
Other 79 8%
Unknown 208 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 199. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#201,326
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#11,981
of 99,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,280
of 213,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#140
of 959 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 959 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.