↓ Skip to main content

Mutations in GRIN2A cause idiopathic focal epilepsy with rolandic spikes

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
386 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
302 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mutations in GRIN2A cause idiopathic focal epilepsy with rolandic spikes
Published in
Nature Genetics, August 2013
DOI 10.1038/ng.2728
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johannes R Lemke, Dennis Lal, Eva M Reinthaler, Isabelle Steiner, Michael Nothnagel, Michael Alber, Kirsten Geider, Bodo Laube, Michael Schwake, Katrin Finsterwalder, Andre Franke, Markus Schilhabel, Johanna A Jähn, Hiltrud Muhle, Rainer Boor, Wim Van Paesschen, Roberto Caraballo, Natalio Fejerman, Sarah Weckhuysen, Peter De Jonghe, Jan Larsen, Rikke S Møller, Helle Hjalgrim, Laura Addis, Shan Tang, Elaine Hughes, Deb K Pal, Kadi Veri, Ulvi Vaher, Tiina Talvik, Petia Dimova, Rosa Guerrero López, José M Serratosa, Tarja Linnankivi, Anna-Elina Lehesjoki, Susanne Ruf, Markus Wolff, Sarah Buerki, Gabriele Wohlrab, Judith Kroell, Alexandre N Datta, Barbara Fiedler, Gerhard Kurlemann, Gerhard Kluger, Andreas Hahn, D Edda Haberlandt, Christina Kutzer, Jürgen Sperner, Felicitas Becker, Yvonne G Weber, Martha Feucht, Hannelore Steinböck, Birgit Neophythou, Gabriel M Ronen, Ursula Gruber-Sedlmayr, Julia Geldner, Robert J Harvey, Per Hoffmann, Stefan Herms, Janine Altmüller, Mohammad R Toliat, Holger Thiele, Peter Nürnberg, Christian Wilhelm, Ulrich Stephani, Ingo Helbig, Holger Lerche, Fritz Zimprich, Bernd A Neubauer, Saskia Biskup, Sarah von Spiczak

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 288 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 64 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 15%
Student > Bachelor 32 11%
Student > Master 24 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 6%
Other 63 21%
Unknown 58 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 18%
Neuroscience 48 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 9%
Psychology 6 2%
Other 19 6%
Unknown 77 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2023.
All research outputs
#791,362
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#1,457
of 7,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,305
of 213,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#25
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.