↓ Skip to main content

Small Deletion Variants Have Stable Breakpoints Commonly Associated with Alu Elements

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Small Deletion Variants Have Stable Breakpoints Commonly Associated with Alu Elements
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0003104
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam J. de Smith, Robin G. Walters, Lachlan J. M. Coin, Israel Steinfeld, Zohar Yakhini, Rob Sladek, Philippe Froguel, Alexandra I. F. Blakemore

Abstract

Copy number variants (CNVs) contribute significantly to human genomic variation, with over 5000 loci reported, covering more than 18% of the euchromatic human genome. Little is known, however, about the origin and stability of variants of different size and complexity. We investigated the breakpoints of 20 small, common deletions, representing a subset of those originally identified by array CGH, using Agilent microarrays, in 50 healthy French Caucasian subjects. By sequencing PCR products amplified using primers designed to span the deleted regions, we determined the exact size and genomic position of the deletions in all affected samples. For each deletion studied, all individuals carrying the deletion share identical upstream and downstream breakpoints at the sequence level, suggesting that the deletion event occurred just once and later became common in the population. This is supported by linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis, which has revealed that most of the deletions studied are in moderate to strong LD with surrounding SNPs, and have conserved long-range haplotypes. Analysis of the sequences flanking the deletion breakpoints revealed an enrichment of microhomology at the breakpoint junctions. More significantly, we found an enrichment of Alu repeat elements, the overwhelming majority of which intersected deletion breakpoints at their poly-A tails. We found no enrichment of LINE elements or segmental duplications, in contrast to other reports. Sequence analysis revealed enrichment of a conserved motif in the sequences surrounding the deletion breakpoints, although whether this motif has any mechanistic role in the formation of some deletions has yet to be determined. Considered together with existing information on more complex inherited variant regions, and reports of de novo variants associated with autism, these data support the presence of different subgroups of CNV in the genome which may have originated through different mechanisms.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 4%
Netherlands 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 62 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 26%
Student > Master 7 10%
Professor 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 3 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 13%
Computer Science 3 4%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 2 3%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2014.
All research outputs
#5,861,007
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#70,325
of 193,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,141
of 84,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#286
of 439 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 439 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.