| Title |
Using Data to Motivate Action: The Need for High Quality, an Effective Presentation, and an Action Context for Decision-making
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Causes & Control, October 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10552-005-0457-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bruce L. Black, Rebecca Cowens-Alvarado, Susan Gershman, Hannah K. Weir |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 24% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 52% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2008.
All research outputs
#7,916,538
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#950
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,309
of 60,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#12
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.