↓ Skip to main content

Mediation and Moderation Effects of an In-Home Family Intervention: the “In control: No alcohol!” Pilot Study

Overview of attention for article published in Prevention Science, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Mediation and Moderation Effects of an In-Home Family Intervention: the “In control: No alcohol!” Pilot Study
Published in
Prevention Science, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11121-013-0424-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evelien Vermeulen-Smit, Suzanne H. W. Mares, Jacqueline E. E. Verdurmen, Haske Van der Vorst, Ingrid G. H. Schulten, Rutger C. M. E. Engels, Wilma A. M. Vollebergh

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of a theory-based in-home family intervention (In control: No alcohol!) on adolescent alcohol cognitions via its putative mediators using a randomized controlled design. In the South Holland region of the Netherlands, a total of 213 children (11-12 years) and their mothers were randomly assigned to the prevention program (108 dyads) and the control condition (105 dyads). Mediation effects were analyzed using pretest and two follow-up measurements (5 and 12 months after baseline). A path model was estimated (using Mplus) to examine the effect of the intervention on the putative mediators (frequency- and quality of mother-child communication, rules about alcohol, establishing a nondrinking agreement, and parental monitoring of the child's whereabouts). Outcomes were adolescents' perceived harmfulness of drinking and intention to drink. Multigroup analyses were performed to examine potential differences across gender. The program led to an increase in frequency of alcohol-specific communication, nondrinking agreements, and parental monitoring. Moreover, adolescents in the experimental condition perceived drinking to be more harmful and had less intention to drink compared to adolescents in the control condition. The effect of the program on adolescent alcohol cognitions was significantly mediated through having more frequent conversations about alcohol, yet only among boys. Although results on actual drinking need to be added, findings indicate that this relatively inexpensive, easy-to-administer home intervention is promising.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 85 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 16 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 33%
Social Sciences 16 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 21 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2015.
All research outputs
#20,198,525
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from Prevention Science
#977
of 1,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,269
of 197,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Prevention Science
#16
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.