↓ Skip to main content

The influence of vitamin C on systemic markers of endothelial and inflammatory cell activation in smokers and non-smokers

Overview of attention for article published in Inflammation Research, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
The influence of vitamin C on systemic markers of endothelial and inflammatory cell activation in smokers and non-smokers
Published in
Inflammation Research, March 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00011-004-1335-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. A. Scott, R. N. Poston, R. F. Wilson, P. Y. Coward, R. M. Palmer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 24%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Unspecified 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 6 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 16%
Unspecified 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2010.
All research outputs
#7,522,368
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Inflammation Research
#242
of 960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,925
of 60,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inflammation Research
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.