You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Potential impact of new oral anticoagulants on the management of atrial fibrillation‐related stroke in primary care
|
---|---|
Published in |
International journal of clinical practice, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1111/ijcp.12177 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
K. Harris, J. Mant |
Abstract |
Anticoagulant prophylaxis with vitamin K antagonists (such as warfarin) is effective in reducing the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). New oral anticoagulants have emerged as potential alternatives to traditional oral agents. The purpose of this review was to summarise the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban in stroke prevention in patients with AF in phase III trials, evaluate their cost-effectiveness and consider the implications for primary care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Denmark | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Slovenia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 92 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 22 | 23% |
Researcher | 15 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Other | 15 | 16% |
Unknown | 16 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 51% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 10% |
Unknown | 17 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2013.
All research outputs
#7,777,586
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International journal of clinical practice
#846
of 2,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,337
of 204,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International journal of clinical practice
#15
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,553 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.