↓ Skip to main content

Pediatric Health Care Quality Measures: Considerations for Pharmacotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Drugs, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Pediatric Health Care Quality Measures: Considerations for Pharmacotherapy
Published in
Pediatric Drugs, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40272-013-0042-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edwin A. Lomotan, Denise Dougherty

Abstract

Measuring the quality use of medicines can be conceptualized as a mechanism for understanding appropriate use, underuse, overuse, or misuse. For pediatric pharmacotherapy, measuring the quality use of medicines requires awareness of the differences in health care between children and adults and the differences in the quality and quantity of science that supports evidence-based practice in pediatric health care compared with adult health care. Here we use the Pediatric Quality Measures Program that arose from the Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act in the United States to illustrate the challenges in developing quality measures of pediatric pharmacotherapy. The challenges are primarily twofold: (i) weak evidence base for the specific pharmacotherapy in children and (ii) limited data to calculate the measure. A weak evidence base must often be weighed against the importance of the topic if the quality measure is intended to address a known quality of care or public health problem. Limited data because of insufficient amount or inappropriate type will affect implementation of the measure and its eventual usefulness. Methods to meet these challenges often depend on the priorities of and the tools available to end users. Health information technology is emerging as a tool to improve quality measurement but presents additional challenges.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 21%
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Librarian 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 12%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Psychology 3 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2013.
All research outputs
#14,174,202
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Drugs
#365
of 549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,970
of 197,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Drugs
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 549 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.