↓ Skip to main content

The impact of molecular systematics on hypotheses for the evolution of root nodule symbioses and implications for expanding symbioses to new host plant genera

Overview of attention for article published in Plant and Soil, July 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
The impact of molecular systematics on hypotheses for the evolution of root nodule symbioses and implications for expanding symbioses to new host plant genera
Published in
Plant and Soil, July 1997
DOI 10.1023/a:1004240004063
Authors

Susan M. Swensen, Beth C. Mullin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 44%
Professor 2 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 67%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Unspecified 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Plant and Soil
#962
of 3,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,363
of 28,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant and Soil
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.