↓ Skip to main content

A Multidimensional Approach to Apathy after Traumatic Brain Injury

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychology Review, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
A Multidimensional Approach to Apathy after Traumatic Brain Injury
Published in
Neuropsychology Review, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11065-013-9236-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annabelle Arnould, Lucien Rochat, Philippe Azouvi, Martial Van der Linden

Abstract

Apathy is commonly described following traumatic brain injury (TBI) and is associated with serious consequences, notably for patients' participation in rehabilitation, family life and later social reintegration. There is strong evidence in the literature of the multidimensional nature of apathy (behavioural, cognitive and emotional), but the processes underlying each dimension are still unclear. The purpose of this article is first, to provide a critical review of the current definitions and instruments used to measure apathy in neurological and psychiatric disorders, and second, to review the prevalence, characteristics, neuroanatomical correlates, relationships with other neurobehavioural disorders and mechanisms of apathy in the TBI population. In this context, we propose a new multidimensional framework that takes into account the various mechanisms at play in the facets of apathy, including not only cognitive factors, especially executive, but also affective factors (e.g., negative mood), motivational variables (e.g., anticipatory pleasure) and aspects related to personal identity (e.g., self-esteem). Future investigations that consider these various factors will help improve the understanding of apathy. This theoretical framework opens up relevant prospects for better clinical assessment and rehabilitation of these frequently described motivational disorders in patients with brain injury.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 148 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 15%
Researcher 20 13%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Other 9 6%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 32 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 50 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 15%
Neuroscience 17 11%
Unspecified 8 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 38 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,187,206
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychology Review
#219
of 453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,922
of 197,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychology Review
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them