You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Advanced porous carbon electrodes for electrochemical capacitors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Chemistry, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1039/c3ta11114h |
| Authors |
Li Li Zhang, Yi Gu, X. S. Zhao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 160 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 25% |
| Researcher | 26 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 17% |
| Unknown | 33 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 39 | 23% |
| Materials Science | 31 | 19% |
| Chemical Engineering | 17 | 10% |
| Engineering | 16 | 10% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 40 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2013.
All research outputs
#6,419,279
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Chemistry
#2,981
of 19,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,883
of 291,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Chemistry
#160
of 496 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,298 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 496 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.