↓ Skip to main content

Genetics of Antipsychotic-induced Side Effects and Agranulocytosis

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Genetics of Antipsychotic-induced Side Effects and Agranulocytosis
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11920-011-0185-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nabilah I. Chowdhury, Gary Remington, James L. Kennedy

Abstract

Antipsychotic medication has been enormously helpful in the treatment of psychotic symptoms during the past several decades. Unfortunately, several important side effects that can cause significant morbidity and mortality. The two most common are abnormal involuntary movements (tardive dyskinesia) and weight gain progressing through diabetes to metabolic syndrome. A more rare and life-threatening adverse effect is clozapine-induced agranulocytosis (CIA), which has been linked to clozapine use. Clozapine itself has a unique position among antipsychotic medications, representing the treatment of choice in refractory schizophrenia. Unfortunately, the potential risk of agranulocytosis, albeit small, prevents the widespread use of clozapine. Very few genetic determinants have been clearly associated with CIA due to small sample sizes and lack of replication in subsequent studies. The HLA system has been the main hypothesized region of interest in the study of CIA, and several gene variants in this region have been implicated, particularly variants of the HLA-DQB1 locus. A preliminary genome-wide association study has been conducted on a small sample for CIA, and a signal from the HLA region was noted. However, efforts to identify key gene mechanisms that will be useful in predicting antipsychotic side effects in the clinical setting have not been fully successful, and further studies with larger sample sizes are required.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Chile 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 86 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Researcher 14 16%
Other 9 10%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 13%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 25 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2013.
All research outputs
#20,198,525
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#1,123
of 1,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,205
of 106,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.