| Title |
Giant uterine artery pseudoaneurysm after a missed miscarriage termination in a cesarean scar pregnancy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Women's Health, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6874-14-89 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yun Mou, Yuezhen Xu, Ying Hu, Tianan Jiang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 20% |
| Unknown | 7 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 40% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,448,169
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from BMC Women's Health
#1,279
of 1,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,126
of 229,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Women's Health
#18
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.