↓ Skip to main content

Revision of comprehensive cancer control plans: experiences shared by three states

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Causes & Control, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Revision of comprehensive cancer control plans: experiences shared by three states
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10552-010-9662-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Polly Hager, Leslie Given, Jennifer Redmond, Kimberly Rogers

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 7%
United States 1 7%
Canada 1 7%
Unknown 11 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Librarian 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 36%
Social Sciences 2 14%
Psychology 1 7%
Mathematics 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2012.
All research outputs
#7,916,538
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#950
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,708
of 101,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#14
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.