| Title |
Genetic monitoring to evaluate reintroduction attempts of a highly endangered rodent
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-017-0940-z |
| Authors |
M. J. J. La Haye, T. E. Reiners, R. Raedts, V. Verbist, H. P. Koelewijn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 21% |
| Researcher | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 9% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2023.
All research outputs
#4,266,423
of 25,550,333 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#229
of 1,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,971
of 325,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#10
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,550,333 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.