| Title |
Does torture work? Donald Trump and the CIA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp17x689701 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mary Lowth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 29% |
| Poland | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Comoros | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 96% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 36% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
| Researcher | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 3 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#391,082
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#149
of 4,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,249
of 325,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#4
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.