↓ Skip to main content

Ballistics reviews: mechanisms of bullet wound trauma

Overview of attention for article published in Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 1,014)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Ballistics reviews: mechanisms of bullet wound trauma
Published in
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, July 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12024-009-9096-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas Maiden

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 94 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Student > Master 13 13%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 25 26%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 12%
Engineering 9 9%
Unspecified 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 20 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,491,704
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#36
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,519
of 113,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them