↓ Skip to main content

Guiding reinvention of conventional tools of mathematical logic: students’ reasoning about mathematical disjunctions

Overview of attention for article published in Educational Studies in Mathematics, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Guiding reinvention of conventional tools of mathematical logic: students’ reasoning about mathematical disjunctions
Published in
Educational Studies in Mathematics, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10649-016-9722-7
Authors

Paul Christian Dawkins, John Paul Cook

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 11 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Professor 4 7%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 18 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 14 26%
Social Sciences 11 20%
Arts and Humanities 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 19 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2017.
All research outputs
#18,535,896
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Educational Studies in Mathematics
#684
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,407
of 332,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Studies in Mathematics
#16
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.