↓ Skip to main content

The Relationship Between Advances in Understanding the Microbiome and the Maturing Hygiene Hypothesis

Overview of attention for article published in Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
Title
The Relationship Between Advances in Understanding the Microbiome and the Maturing Hygiene Hypothesis
Published in
Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11882-013-0382-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meike Bendiks, Matthias Volkmar Kopp

Abstract

Expanding knowledge about an interaction of the bacterial colonization with pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria and the human immune system leads to speculation on potential effects on health and disease. Recent advances in sequencing technologies and new bioinformatic possibilities now allow investigating the microbes that colonize the human gut, skin and airways in more detail. In light of the hygiene hypothesis, the impact of the microbial composition of individuals with allergic sensitization and/or atopic diseases, i.e., allergic asthma or atopic eczema, were investigated in several clinical trials. Altered diversity of gut microbiota during infancy as well as colonization with specific pathogenic and apathogenic bacteria has been linked with an elevated risk for allergy. There are ongoing attempts to establish intervention strategies aimed at modifying initial colonization patterns in early life. While results from animal models, in-vitro data and epidemiological studies encourage the concept of a relationship between the microbiome and the development of allergic diseases, the transfer of these findings to intervention strategies still seems to be a major challenge.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 163 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 16%
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Master 15 9%
Other 13 8%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 30 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 34 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2014.
All research outputs
#18,343,746
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
#653
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,816
of 197,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
#17
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.