| Title |
Genome-wide association study identifies four novel loci associated with Alzheimer’s endophenotypes and disease modifiers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00401-017-1685-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuetiva Deming, Zeran Li, Manav Kapoor, Oscar Harari, Jorge L. Del-Aguila, Kathleen Black, David Carrell, Yefei Cai, Maria Victoria Fernandez, John Budde, Shengmei Ma, Benjamin Saef, Bill Howells, Kuan-lin Huang, Sarah Bertelsen, Anne M. Fagan, David M. Holtzman, John C. Morris, Sungeun Kim, Andrew J. Saykin, Philip L. De Jager, Marilyn Albert, Abhay Moghekar, Richard O’Brien, Matthias Riemenschneider, Ronald C. Petersen, Kaj Blennow, Henrik Zetterberg, Lennart Minthon, Vivianna M. Van Deerlin, Virginia Man-Yee Lee, Leslie M. Shaw, John Q. Trojanowski, Gerard Schellenberg, Jonathan L. Haines, Richard Mayeux, Margaret A. Pericak-Vance, Lindsay A. Farrer, Elaine R. Peskind, Ge Li, Antonio F. Di Narzo, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), The Alzheimer Disease Genetic Consortium (ADGC), John S. K. Kauwe, Alison M. Goate, Carlos Cruchaga |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 48% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 28% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 52% |
| Scientists | 9 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 245 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 48 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Professor | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 42 | 17% |
| Unknown | 51 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 55 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 37 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 10% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 11% |
| Unknown | 66 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,651,944
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#310
of 2,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,648
of 326,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#11
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.