You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A global threats overview for Numeniini populations: synthesising expert knowledge for a group of declining migratory birds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bird Conservation International, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s0959270916000678 |
| Authors |
JAMES W. PEARCE-HIGGINS, DANIEL J. BROWN, DAVID J. T. DOUGLAS, JOSÉ A. ALVES, MARIAGRAZIA BELLIO, PIERRICK BOCHER, GRAEME M. BUCHANAN, ROB P. CLAY, JESSE CONKLIN, NICOLA CROCKFORD, PETER DANN, JAANUS ELTS, CHRISTIAN FRIIS, RICHARD A. FULLER, JENNIFER A. GILL, KEN GOSBELL, JAMES A. JOHNSON, ROCIO MARQUEZ-FERRANDO, JOSE A. MASERO, DAVID S. MELVILLE, SPIKE MILLINGTON, CLIVE MINTON, TAEJ MUNDKUR, ERICA NOL, HANNES PEHLAK, THEUNIS PIERSMA, FRÉDÉRIC ROBIN, DANNY I. ROGERS, DANIEL R. RUTHRAUFF, NATHAN R. SENNER, JUNID N. SHAH, ROB D. SHELDON, SERGEJ A. SOLOVIEV, PAVEL S. TOMKOVICH, YVONNE I. VERKUIL |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 171 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 53 | 31% |
| United States | 11 | 6% |
| Canada | 5 | 3% |
| Spain | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Argentina | 3 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 1% |
| Faroe Islands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 70 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 142 | 83% |
| Scientists | 18 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 195 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 17% |
| Researcher | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 60 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 79 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 38 | 19% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 65 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 132. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2022.
All research outputs
#320,288
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Bird Conservation International
#9
of 810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,731
of 326,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bird Conservation International
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.