↓ Skip to main content

Deceptive-like behaviour in dogs (Canis familiaris)

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 1,579)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
123 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
52 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
Deceptive-like behaviour in dogs (Canis familiaris)
Published in
Animal Cognition, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10071-017-1078-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marianne T. E. Heberlein, Marta B. Manser, Dennis C. Turner

Abstract

Deception, the use of false signals to modify the behaviour of the receiver, occurs in low frequencies even in stable signalling systems. For example, it can be advantageous for subordinate individuals to deceive in competitive situations. We investigated in a three-way choice task whether dogs are able to mislead a human competitor, i.e. if they are capable of tactical deception. During training, dogs experienced the role of their owner, as always being cooperative, and two unfamiliar humans, one acting 'cooperatively' by giving food and the other being 'competitive' and keeping the food for themselves. During the test, the dog had the options to lead one of these partners to one of the three potential food locations: one contained a favoured food item, the other a non-preferred food item and the third remained empty. After having led one of the partners, the dog always had the possibility of leading its cooperative owner to one of the food locations. Therefore, a dog would have a direct benefit from misleading the competitive partner since it would then get another chance to receive the preferred food from the owner. On the first test day, the dogs led the cooperative partner to the preferred food box more often than expected by chance and more often than the competitive partner. On the second day, they even led the competitive partner less often to the preferred food than expected by chance and more often to the empty box than the cooperative partner. These results show that dogs distinguished between the cooperative and the competitive partner, and indicate the flexibility of dogs to adjust their behaviour and that they are able to use tactical deception.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Unknown 91 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 21 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 33%
Psychology 22 23%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 5%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 25 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1071. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#14,614
of 25,637,545 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#6
of 1,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248
of 325,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,637,545 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.