↓ Skip to main content

Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
8009 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7270 Mendeley
citeulike
36 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer
Published in
Nature, August 2013
DOI 10.1038/nature12477
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ludmil B. Alexandrov, Serena Nik-Zainal, David C. Wedge, Samuel A. J. R. Aparicio, Sam Behjati, Andrew V. Biankin, Graham R. Bignell, Niccolò Bolli, Ake Borg, Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale, Sandrine Boyault, Birgit Burkhardt, Adam P. Butler, Carlos Caldas, Helen R. Davies, Christine Desmedt, Roland Eils, Jórunn Erla Eyfjörd, John A. Foekens, Mel Greaves, Fumie Hosoda, Barbara Hutter, Tomislav Ilicic, Sandrine Imbeaud, Marcin Imielinski, Natalie Jäger, David T. W. Jones, David Jones, Stian Knappskog, Marcel Kool, Sunil R. Lakhani, Carlos López-Otín, Sancha Martin, Nikhil C. Munshi, Hiromi Nakamura, Paul A. Northcott, Marina Pajic, Elli Papaemmanuil, Angelo Paradiso, John V. Pearson, Xose S. Puente, Keiran Raine, Manasa Ramakrishna, Andrea L. Richardson, Julia Richter, Philip Rosenstiel, Matthias Schlesner, Ton N. Schumacher, Paul N. Span, Jon W. Teague, Yasushi Totoki, Andrew N. J. Tutt, Rafael Valdés-Mas, Marit M. van Buuren, Laura van ’t Veer, Anne Vincent-Salomon, Nicola Waddell, Lucy R. Yates, Jessica Zucman-Rossi, P. Andrew Futreal, Ultan McDermott, Peter Lichter, Matthew Meyerson, Sean M. Grimmond, Reiner Siebert, Elías Campo, Tatsuhiro Shibata, Stefan M. Pfister, Peter J. Campbell, Michael R. Stratton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 246 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7,270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 67 <1%
United Kingdom 34 <1%
Germany 19 <1%
Netherlands 10 <1%
France 9 <1%
Spain 9 <1%
Switzerland 8 <1%
Japan 8 <1%
Canada 8 <1%
Other 67 <1%
Unknown 7031 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1552 21%
Researcher 1450 20%
Student > Master 714 10%
Student > Bachelor 694 10%
Other 387 5%
Other 1130 16%
Unknown 1343 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1796 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1669 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 1231 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 261 4%
Computer Science 206 3%
Other 603 8%
Unknown 1504 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 703. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#29,778
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#2,752
of 98,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144
of 209,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#17
of 965 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 965 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.