↓ Skip to main content

Zika virus: An emerging flavivirus

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Microbiology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
329 Mendeley
Title
Zika virus: An emerging flavivirus
Published in
Journal of Microbiology, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12275-017-7063-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sang-Im Yun, Young-Min Lee

Abstract

Zika virus (ZIKV) is a previously little-known flavivirus closely related to Japanese encephalitis, West Nile, dengue, and yellow fever viruses, all of which are primarily transmitted by blood-sucking mosquitoes. Since its discovery in Uganda in 1947, ZIKV has continued to expand its geographic range, from equatorial Africa and Asia to the Pacific Islands, then further afield to South and Central America and the Caribbean. Currently, ZIKV is actively circulating not only in much of Latin America and its neighbors but also in parts of the Pacific Islands and Southeast Asia. Although ZIKV infection generally causes only mild symptoms in some infected individuals, it is associated with a range of neuroimmunological disorders, including Guillain-Barré syndrome, meningoencephalitis, and myelitis. Recently, maternal ZIKV infection during pregnancy has been linked to neonatal malformations, resulting in various degrees of congenital abnormalities, microcephaly, and even abortion. Despite its emergence as an important public health problem, however, little is known about ZIKV biology, and neither vaccine nor drug is available to control ZIKV infection. This article provides a brief introduction to ZIKV with a major emphasis on its molecular virology, in order to help facilitate the development of diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 328 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 70 21%
Student > Master 66 20%
Researcher 29 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 39 12%
Unknown 74 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 63 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 43 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 32 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 5%
Other 53 16%
Unknown 86 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2023.
All research outputs
#5,049,987
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Microbiology
#88
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,752
of 313,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Microbiology
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.