You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biomedical Nanotechnology
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-6840-4 |
| ISBNs |
978-1-4939-6838-1, 978-1-4939-6840-4
|
| Editors |
Sarah Hurst Petrosko, Emily S. Day |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 73% |
| Mexico | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 615 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 615 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | <1% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | <1% |
| Student > Master | 4 | <1% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | <1% |
| Researcher | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 590 | 96% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 4 | <1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | <1% |
| Engineering | 3 | <1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | <1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 1% |
| Unknown | 593 | 96% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,894,905
of 23,544,006 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#274
of 13,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,716
of 423,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#45
of 1,073 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,544,006 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,395 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,073 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.