↓ Skip to main content

Histamine Forming Halophilic Bacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon eiseigaku zasshi Japanese journal of hygiene, January 1958
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Histamine Forming Halophilic Bacteria
Published in
Nihon eiseigaku zasshi Japanese journal of hygiene, January 1958
DOI 10.1265/jjh.13.354
Authors

Hiromi Iida, Yoshikazu Kaise, Kazuyoshi Aiiso

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Nihon eiseigaku zasshi Japanese journal of hygiene
#65
of 241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#456
of 6,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon eiseigaku zasshi Japanese journal of hygiene
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.