↓ Skip to main content

Pregnancies after Adjustable Gastric Banding

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, June 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Pregnancies after Adjustable Gastric Banding
Published in
Obesity Surgery, June 2001
DOI 10.1381/096089201321336647
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helmut G Weiss, Hermann Nehoda, Burkhard Labeck, Katherine Hourmont, Christian Marth, Franz Aigner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 21%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 19 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2010.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#1,285
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,149
of 41,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.