↓ Skip to main content

Complement anaphylatoxin C3a is a potent inducer of embryonic chick retina regeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Complement anaphylatoxin C3a is a potent inducer of embryonic chick retina regeneration
Published in
Nature Communications, August 2013
DOI 10.1038/ncomms3312
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tracy Haynes, Agustin Luz-Madrigal, Edimara S. Reis, Nancy P. Echeverri Ruiz, Erika Grajales-Esquivel, Apostolia Tzekou, Panagiotis A. Tsonis, John D. Lambris, Katia Del Rio-Tsonis

Abstract

Identifying the initiation signals for tissue regeneration in vertebrates is one of the major challenges in regenerative biology. Much of the research thus far has indicated that certain growth factors have key roles. Here we show that complement fragment C3a is sufficient to induce complete regeneration of the embryonic chick retina from stem/progenitor cells present in the eye, independent of fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling. Instead, C3a induces retina regeneration via STAT3 activation, which in turn activates the injury- and inflammation-responsive factors, IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α. This activation sets forth regulation of Wnt2b, Six3 and Sox2, genes associated with retina stem and progenitor cells. Thus, our results establish a mechanism for retina regeneration based on injury and inflammation signals. Furthermore, our results indicate a unique function for complement anaphylatoxins that implicate these molecules in the induction and complete regeneration of the retina, opening new avenues of experimentation in the field.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 73 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 27%
Researcher 16 21%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 15%
Neuroscience 8 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2013.
All research outputs
#13,893,979
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#39,500
of 46,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,866
of 196,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#274
of 362 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 362 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.