↓ Skip to main content

Aluminum hyperaccumulation in angiosperms: A review of its phylogenetic significance

Overview of attention for article published in The Botanical Review, April 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
232 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Aluminum hyperaccumulation in angiosperms: A review of its phylogenetic significance
Published in
The Botanical Review, April 2002
DOI 10.1663/0006-8101(2002)068[0235:ahiaar]2.0.co;2
Authors

Steven Jansen, Martin R. Broadley, Elmar Robbrecht, Erik Smets

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 3%
United States 5 3%
Poland 2 1%
Bolivia, Plurinational State of 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 163 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 17%
Researcher 30 17%
Student > Master 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 45 25%
Unknown 23 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 110 61%
Environmental Science 19 11%
Chemistry 6 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 3%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 28 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2008.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from The Botanical Review
#81
of 322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,272
of 128,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Botanical Review
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them