| Title |
Technical Factors that Affect Anastomotic Integrity Following Esophagectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-013-3189-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sheraz R. Markar, Shobhit Arya, Alan Karthikesalingam, George B. Hanna |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Mexico | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 23 | 21% |
| Unknown | 29 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 65% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 32 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,019,387
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1,947
of 6,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,889
of 196,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#14
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.