↓ Skip to main content

Excess weight and associated risk factors in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Overview of attention for article published in Rheumatology International, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Excess weight and associated risk factors in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
Published in
Rheumatology International, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00296-012-2402-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabiana de Miranda Moura dos Santos, Mariane Curado Borges, Rosa Weiss Telles, Maria Isabel T. D. Correia, Cristina Costa Duarte Lanna

Abstract

The objective of this study is to determine the socio-demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics of outpatients with SLE who present with excess weight as well as to assess the immunosuppressive therapy used. One hundred and seventy women with SLE were evaluated consecutively in a transversal study. The relationship between excess weight and the patients' characteristics was evaluated using univariate and multivariate Poisson regression analysis. Of the 170 patients evaluated, 109 presented with excess weight, two were malnourished and 59 were classified as eutrophic. Age and disease duration of those with excess weight were 42.4 ± 8.7 and 10.4 ± 6.2 years, respectively. Risk factors associated with excess weight were the following: age ≥40 years, <8 years of education, lack of occupation, damage index ≥1, systemic high blood pressure, diabetes mellitus and triglycerides ≥150 mg/dL levels. The use of antimalarial therapy and steroids was associated with a lower frequency of excess weight. Age ≥40 years and the non-usage of methotrexate were the variables independently associated with excess weight in the multivariate analysis. Patients with SLE who have excess weight present distinct clinical-laboratory findings, socio-demographic characteristics and treatment options when compared to normal weight patients. Prospective studies should assess whether these characteristics will interfere with the outcome or prognosis of lupus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 6%
Unknown 33 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 23%
Student > Postgraduate 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2013.
All research outputs
#20,198,525
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from Rheumatology International
#1,966
of 2,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,561
of 162,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheumatology International
#25
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.