| Title |
Influence of integrated services on postpartum family planning use: a cross-sectional survey from urban Senegal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-752 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ilene S Speizer, Jean Christophe Fotso, Chinelo Okigbo, Cheikh Mbacké Faye, Cheikh Seck |
| Abstract |
Although the majority of postpartum women indicate a desire to delay a next birth, family planning (FP) methods are often not offered to, or taken up by, women in the first year postpartum. This study uses data from urban Senegal to examine exposure to FP information and services at the time of delivery and at child immunization appointments and to determine if these points of integration are associated with greater use of postpartum FP. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 169 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 21% |
| Researcher | 29 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 19% |
| Unknown | 41 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 33 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 14% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 46 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2013.
All research outputs
#19,292,491
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#13,375
of 15,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,203
of 199,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#240
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.