↓ Skip to main content

Cardiorespiratory and Metabolic Changes during Yoga Sessions: The Effects of Respiratory Exercises and Meditation Practices

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
Title
Cardiorespiratory and Metabolic Changes during Yoga Sessions: The Effects of Respiratory Exercises and Meditation Practices
Published in
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, March 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10484-008-9053-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcello Árias Dias Danucalov, Roberto Serafim Simões, Elisa Harumi Kozasa, José Roberto Leite

Abstract

The novelty of this study was to investigate the changes in cardiorespiratory and metabolic intensity brought about by the practice of pranayamas (breathing exercises of yoga) and meditation during the same hatha-yoga session. The technique applied was the one advocated by the hatha-yoga system. Nine yoga instructors-five females and four males, mean age of 44+/-11, 6, were subjected to analysis of the gases expired during three distinct periods of 30 min: rest, respiratory exercises and meditative practice. A metabolic open circuit computerized system was applied (VO2000, MedGraphics-USA). The oxygen uptake (VO(2)) and the carbon dioxide output (VCO(2)) were statistically different (P <or= 0.05) during meditation and pranayama practices when compared with rest. The heart rate also suffered relevant reductions when results at rest were compared with those during meditation. A smaller proportion of lipids was metabolized during meditation practice compared with rest. The results suggest that the meditation used in this study reduces the metabolic rate whereas the specific pranayama technique in this study increases it when compared with the rest state.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 177 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 14%
Student > Master 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Other 39 21%
Unknown 33 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 40 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 17%
Sports and Recreations 17 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 8%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 35 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2022.
All research outputs
#19,246,640
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#301
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,375
of 81,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.