↓ Skip to main content

Screening of encapsulated microbial cells for the degradation of inorganic cyanides

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, February 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Screening of encapsulated microbial cells for the degradation of inorganic cyanides
Published in
Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, February 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf01583677
Authors

Kirit D Chapatwala, G R V Babu, James H Wolfram

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 50%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2006.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
#575
of 1,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,253
of 65,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,612 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.