You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Addition of Biphasic, Prandial, or Basal Insulin to Oral Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, September 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa075392 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rury R Holman, Kerensa I Thorne, Andrew J Farmer, Melanie J Davies, Joanne F Keenan, Sanjoy Paul, Jonathan C Levy |
| Abstract |
Adding insulin to oral therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus is customary when glycemic control is suboptimal, though evidence supporting specific insulin regimens is limited. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 290 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 54 | 17% |
| Other | 51 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 41 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 9% |
| Other | 79 | 25% |
| Unknown | 32 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 218 | 69% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 6% |
| Unknown | 42 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#750,058
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#8,214
of 32,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,158
of 83,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#25
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.