↓ Skip to main content

African American Women in the Workplace: Relationships Between Job Conditions, Racial Bias at Work, and Perceived Job Quality

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Community Psychology, October 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
African American Women in the Workplace: Relationships Between Job Conditions, Racial Bias at Work, and Perceived Job Quality
Published in
American Journal of Community Psychology, October 1997
DOI 10.1023/a:1024630816168
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diane Hughes, Mark A. Dodge

Abstract

Although studies have described work processes among employed African American women, few have examined the influence of these processes on job outcomes. This study examined relationships between African American women's exposure to a range of occupational stressors, including two types of racial bias--institutional discrimination and interpersonal prejudice--and their evaluations of job quality. Findings indicated that institutional discrimination and interpersonal prejudice were more important predictors of job quality among these women than were other occupational stressors such as low task variety and decision authority, heavy workloads, and poor supervision. Racial bias in the workplace was most likely to be reported by workers in predominantly white work settings. In addition, Black women who worked in service, semiskilled, and unskilled occupations reported significantly more institutional discrimination, but not more interpersonal prejudice, than did women in professional, managerial, and technical occupations or those in sales and clerical occupations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 97 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Student > Master 12 12%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 22 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 27%
Social Sciences 20 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 20 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,914,531
of 24,717,692 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Community Psychology
#152
of 1,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,784
of 29,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Community Psychology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them