Consensus classification of posterior cortical atrophy

Sebastian J. Crutch, Jonathan M. Schott, Gil D. Rabinovici, Melissa Murray, Julie S. Snowden, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Bradford C. Dickerson, Rik Vandenberghe, Samrah Ahmed, Thomas H. Bak, Bradley F. Boeve, Christopher Butler, Stefano F. Cappa, Mathieu Ceccaldi, Leonardo Cruz de Souza, Bruno Dubois, Olivier Felician, Douglas Galasko, Jonathan Graff‐Radford, Neill R. Graff‐Radford, Patrick R. Hof, Pierre Krolak‐Salmon, Manja Lehmann, Eloi Magnin, Mario F. Mendez, Peter J. Nestor, Chiadi U. Onyike, Victoria S. Pelak, Yolande Pijnenburg, Silvia Primativo, Martin N. Rossor, Natalie S. Ryan, Philip Scheltens, Timothy J. Shakespeare, Aida Suárez González, David F. Tang‐Wai, Keir X.X. Yong, Maria Carrillo, Nick C. Fox, Alzheimer's Association ISTAART Atypical Alzheimer's Disease and Associated Syndromes Professional Interest Area

A classification framework for posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) is proposed to improve the uniformity of definition of the syndrome in a variety of research settings. Consensus statements about PCA were developed through a detailed literature review, the formation of an international multidisciplinary working party which convened on four occasions, and a Web-based quantitative survey regarding symptom frequency and the conceptualization of PCA. A three-level classification framework for PCA is described comprising both syndrome- and disease-level descriptions. Classification level 1 (PCA) defines the core clinical, cognitive, and neuroimaging features and exclusion criteria of the clinico-radiological syndrome. Classification level 2 (PCA-pure, PCA-plus) establishes whether, in addition to the core PCA syndrome, the core features of any other neurodegenerative syndromes are present. Classification level 3 (PCA attributable to AD [PCA-AD], Lewy body disease [PCA-LBD], corticobasal degeneration [PCA-CBD], prion disease [PCA-prion]) provides a more formal determination of the underlying cause of the PCA syndrome, based on available pathophysiological biomarker evidence. The issue of additional syndrome-level descriptors is discussed in relation to the challenges of defining stages of syndrome severity and characterizing phenotypic heterogeneity within the PCA spectrum. There was strong agreement regarding the definition of the core clinico-radiological syndrome, meaning that the current consensus statement should be regarded as a refinement, development, and extension of previous single-center PCA criteria rather than any wholesale alteration or redescription of the syndrome. The framework and terminology may facilitate the interpretation of research data across studies, be applicable across a broad range of research scenarios (e.g., behavioral interventions, pharmacological trials), and provide a foundation for future collaborative work.