↓ Skip to main content

Organic mercury speciation in fish by capillary gas chromatography interfaced with atomic absorption spectrometry

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, January 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Organic mercury speciation in fish by capillary gas chromatography interfaced with atomic absorption spectrometry
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, January 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf00481966
Authors

Jiang Gui-bin, Ni Zhe-ming, Wang Shun-rong, Han Heng-bin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Chemistry 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 1999.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#2,202
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,351
of 53,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.