↓ Skip to main content

Automated method for analysis of tryptophan and tyrosine metabolites using capillary electrophoresis with native fluorescence detection

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Automated method for analysis of tryptophan and tyrosine metabolites using capillary electrophoresis with native fluorescence detection
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00216-012-6685-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher A. Dailey, Nicolas Garnier, Stanislav S. Rubakhin, Jonathan V. Sweedler

Abstract

Capillary electrophoresis (CE) with laser-induced native fluorescence (LINF) detection offers the ability to characterize low levels of selected analyte classes, depending on the excitation and emission wavelengths used. Here a new automated CE-LINF system that provides deep ultraviolet (DUV) excitation (224 nm) and variable emission wavelength detection was evaluated for the analysis of small molecule tryptophan- and tyrosine-related metabolites. The optimized instrument design includes several features that increase throughput, lower instrument cost and maintenance, and decrease complexity when compared with earlier systems using DUV excitation. Sensitivity is enhanced by using an ellipsoid detection cell to increase the fluorescence collection efficiency. The limits of detection ranged from 4 to 30 nmol/L for serotonin and tyrosine, respectively. The system demonstrated excellent linearity over several orders of magnitude of concentration and intraday precision from 1-11 % relative standard deviation (RSD). The instrument's performance was validated via tryptophan and serotonin characterization using tissue extracts from the mammalian brain stem, with RSDs of less than 10 % for both metabolites. The flexibility and sensitivity offered by DUV laser excitation and tunable emission enables a broad range of small-volume measurements.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 36%
Researcher 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2013.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#7,542
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,186
of 290,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#81
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.