↓ Skip to main content

Reconciling Forest Conservation and Logging in Indonesian Borneo

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
382 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reconciling Forest Conservation and Logging in Indonesian Borneo
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0069887
Pubmed ID
Authors

David L. A. Gaveau, Mrigesh Kshatriya, Douglas Sheil, Sean Sloan, Elis Molidena, Arief Wijaya, Serge Wich, Marc Ancrenaz, Matthew Hansen, Mark Broich, Manuel R. Guariguata, Pablo Pacheco, Peter Potapov, Svetlana Turubanova, Erik Meijaard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 382 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 2%
United States 4 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 363 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 80 21%
Student > Master 71 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 13%
Student > Bachelor 45 12%
Other 25 7%
Other 61 16%
Unknown 50 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 130 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 112 29%
Social Sciences 21 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 3%
Other 20 5%
Unknown 69 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2022.
All research outputs
#601,063
of 25,405,598 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#8,168
of 221,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,590
of 207,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#209
of 4,707 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,405,598 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,707 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.