↓ Skip to main content

Cometabolic degradation of 4-chlorophenol by Alcaligenes eutrophus

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, September 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Cometabolic degradation of 4-chlorophenol by Alcaligenes eutrophus
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, September 1996
DOI 10.1007/s002530050799
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. A. Hill, B. J. Milne, P. A. Nawrocki

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 36%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Lecturer 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Chemistry 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 1999.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2,898
of 8,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,627
of 28,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,290 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.